🔗 Share this article

British American Tobacco has been accused of “utter hypocrisy” for opposing anti-smoking regulations in Africa which are already enforced in the UK.

African regulatory opposition

Documents seen by journalists sent from the company’s subsidiary in Zambia to the nation's political leaders asks for plans to ban tobacco advertising and sponsorship to be abandoned or delayed.

The corporation is pursuing amendments to a proposed legislation that include decreasing the recommended coverage of graphic health warnings on cigarette packaging, the elimination of limitations on flavored smoking items, and diminished punishments for any firms breaking the new laws.

Activist commentary

“If I was a politician, I would say that they allow the safeguarding of the British people and sustain the fatalities of the Zambian people,” said the health advocate.

Over seven thousand citizens a year succumb to tobacco-related illnesses, according to global health agency statistics.

The campaigner stated the letter was understood to have been copied to various ministerial offices and was in distribution within civil society groups.

International corporate influence worries

It comes amid wider concerns about business sector influence with public health regulations. Last month, international health experts sounded an alarm that the cigarette manufacturers was escalating campaigns to dilute worldwide restrictions.

“There is proof of corporate influence globally. Tobacco company fingerprints are on postponed duty hikes in Indonesia, stalled legislation in Zambia and even a diluted statement at the UN high-level meeting,” stated the corporate monitoring director.

Possible outcomes

“If a tobacco control measure isn’t passed because of this letter, the consequences may be suffered in human lives who might possibly give up cigarettes.”

The anti-smoking legislation being considered by Zambia’s parliament includes regulations surpassing UK legislation by extending coverage to e-cigarettes, and stipulating that visual health alerts cover seventy-five percent of product packaging.

Business countermeasures

In the letter, the corporation proposes this be reduced to thirty to fifty percent “within the WHO-FCTC suggested parameters”, postponed for minimum one year after the legislation is approved.

Global health authorities in fact recommends a alert needs to encompass at least 50% of the front of a pack “and seek to occupy as much of the primary showing sections as possible”. Within Britain, warnings need to encompass nearly two-thirds of a cigarette pack surfaces.

Scented product controversy

BAT asks for the removal of broad restrictions on scented smoking items, suggesting that it would lead smokers to “illicitly sold” products. The corporation recommends restricting fewer varieties of “flavours based on desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Every scented tobacco product have been banned in the UK since 2020.

The draft bill recommends punishments for multiple violations “extending from a percentage of annual turnover to ten-year jail sentences”.

Corporate defense

Via documentation, the company executive of the Zambian branch says the corporation is focused on ethical business practices” and “supports the objectives of governments to reduce smoking incidence and the related medical consequences” but asserts that “some regulations can have undesirable and unforeseen outcomes.”

Critic response

The campaigner argued BAT’s proposed changes would “undermine this law so much that the necessary effect for it to produce permanent improvement in society will not be achieved”.

The reality that many such provisions operated within the UK, where the company maintains its main office, was “utter hypocrisy itself”, he said.

“We live in a global village. Should I grow cigarettes in my garden and collect the yield and market the products – and my offspring don't use tobacco, but my neighbor's family uses … to profit individually and all the subsequent offspring while my neighbor's family are succumbing … is in itself total emotional collapse.”

Tobacco control legislation in the UK or elsewhere had failed to shutter businesses, Chimbala said. “Regulations don't close the industry. They merely safeguard the people.”

Official corporate statement

A BAT Zambia spokesperson said: “The company operates its business in compliance with current country statutes. Further, the firm contributes in the nation's lawmaking procedures in line with the appropriate structures which enable relevant group engagement in policymaking.”

The firm positioned itself as “not resisting legislation”, the spokesperson stated, noting that underage people should be protected from acquiring smoking products and nicotine.

“We advocate for progressive regulation to achieve intended population health targets, while acknowledging the spectrum of privileges and responsibilities on businesses, users and involved parties,” the representative explained, mentioning that the corporation's recommendations “mirror the circumstances of the Zambian market and smoking product business, which includes increasing amounts of illicit trade”.

The country's office of economic activities and commercial operations was solicited for statement.